“No reasonable observer would view the artifact as endorsing Christianity,” the judge said. She added that the museum’s creators “have not advanced religion impermissibly, and the cross does not create excessive entanglement between the state and religion.” She said the plaintiffs also failed to allege any form of intentional discrimination or cite any adverse or unequal treatment on the basis of their religious beliefs.
MORE: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/mar/29/ny-judge-tosses-atheist-lawsuit-over-sept-11-steel/
